Theoretical Aspects of Schema Merging
نویسندگان
چکیده
A general technique for merging database schemas is developed that has a number of advantages over existing techniques, the most important of which is that schemas are placed in a partial order that has bounded joins. This means that the merging operation, when it succeeds, is both associative and commutative, i.e., that the merge of schemas is independent of the order in which they are considered — a property not possessed by existing methods. The operation is appropriate for the design of interactive programs as it allows user assertions about relationships between nodes in the schemas to be considered as elementary schemas. These can be combined with existing schemas using precisely the same merging operation. The technique is general and can be applied to a variety of data models. It can also deal with certain cardinality constraints that arise through the imposition of keys. A prototype implementation, together with a graphical interface, has been developed. Comments Postprint version. Published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Advances in Database Technology, Volume 580, 1992, pages 152-167. Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BFb0032429 This conference paper is available at ScholarlyCommons: http://repository.upenn.edu/db_research/10 Theoretical Aspects of Schema Merging ∗ P. Buneman, S. Davidson and A. Kosky Department of Computer and Information Sciences University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6389 Abstract A general technique for merging database schemas is developed that has a number of advantages over existing techniques, the most important of which is that schemas are placed in a partial order that has bounded joins. This means that the merging operation, when it succeeds, is both associative and commutative, i.e., that the merge of schemas is independent of the order in which they are considered — a property not possessed by existing methods. The operation is appropriate for the design of interactive programs as it allows user assertions about relationships between nodes in the schemas to be considered as elementary schemas. These can be combined with existing schemas using precisely the same merging operation. The technique is general and can be applied to a variety of data models. It can also deal with certain cardinality constraints that arise through the imposition of keys. A prototype implementation, together with a graphical interface, has been developed.A general technique for merging database schemas is developed that has a number of advantages over existing techniques, the most important of which is that schemas are placed in a partial order that has bounded joins. This means that the merging operation, when it succeeds, is both associative and commutative, i.e., that the merge of schemas is independent of the order in which they are considered — a property not possessed by existing methods. The operation is appropriate for the design of interactive programs as it allows user assertions about relationships between nodes in the schemas to be considered as elementary schemas. These can be combined with existing schemas using precisely the same merging operation. The technique is general and can be applied to a variety of data models. It can also deal with certain cardinality constraints that arise through the imposition of keys. A prototype implementation, together with a graphical interface, has been developed.
منابع مشابه
Constraint driven schema merging
Schema integration is the process of consolidating several source schemas to generate a unified view, called the mediated schema, so that information scattered in the sources can be served uniformly from the mediated schema. Schema integration occurs in many scenarios such as data integration, logical database design, data warehousing and schema evolution. To make the mediated schema useful for...
متن کاملGeneric Schema Merging
Schema merging is the process of integrating several schemas into a common, unified schema. There have been various approaches to schema merging, focusing on particular modeling languages, or using a lightweight, abstract metamodel. Having a semantically rich representation of models and mappings is particularly important for merging as semantic information is required to resolve the conflicts ...
متن کاملMerging Models Based on Given Correspondences
A model is a formal description of a complex application artifact, such as a database schema, an application interface, a UML model, an ontology, or a message format. The problem of merging such models lies at the core of many meta data applications, such as view integration, mediated schema creation for data integration, and ontology merging. This paper examines the problem of merging two mode...
متن کاملEvolving a Social Networking Platform into a Smart Personalised Learning Environment (PLE) or the Other Way Around: Your Choice?
The future of learning environments lies with the merging of the better aspects of Learning Management Systems (LMS), with those popularised in Social Networking platforms, to personalise the individual learning experience in a PLE (Personal Learning Environment). After examining the details of a particularly flexible LMS, followed by the investigation of several key data structures behind the ...
متن کاملSchema Matching and Schema Merging based on Uncertain Semantic Mappings
This dissertation lies in the research area of schema integration: the problem of combining the data of different data sources by creating a unified representation of these data. Two core issues in schema integration are schema matching, i.e. the identification of correspondences, or mappings, between input schema objects, and schema merging, i.e. the creation of a unified schema based on the i...
متن کامل